- This topic has 7 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
Luigi Angelo Scietti.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
October 31, 2025 at 11:08 #5782
Luigi Angelo SciettiParticipantHi good people,
yesterday a user pointed me to this Expi293 PRO kit (Thermo), that also include Epxi293 PRO cells.
https://tinyurl.com/expi293proApparently, yields are much higher than standard Expi293, at least for transient transfection.
Someone who tried them or know something more?
Is this higher yield due to cells or to transfection reagent?Thanks in advance
have a nice day
Luigi-
This topic was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
Luigi Angelo Scietti.
-
This topic was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
October 31, 2025 at 11:23 #5784
Laure BatailleParticipantHi Luigi,
I was wondering exactly the same thing!
For now we are working with standard Expi293.. and i’ll have a meeting with thermo on monday to discuss about this new kit..
If someone has already tried it, I would also be interested on a feedback
Have a nice day
Laure
-
October 31, 2025 at 11:55 #5785

James ErreyParticipantyes we have been using them for a while now, the media is more expensive but we have seen improved yields for some proteins (not all) for membrane proteins its been double for GPCRs (on average) but ion channels we saw little improvement (for the proteins we tested). For biologics we did see an improvement the most was around 7 fold but it was case by case…. on average they are better but its how the cost of the kits/media aligns with the improved yield
-
October 31, 2025 at 13:08 #5786
Erwan BoedecParticipantHi,
I tested this cell line for the production of recombinant antibodies and observed a three- to seven-fold increase in protein yield.
-
October 31, 2025 at 13:27 #5787
Svend KjaerParticipantWe have just tested the PRO kit with antibodies and seen a substantial increase as well (1 g/L).
So far, quite convinced about their performance
-
October 31, 2025 at 14:35 #5788

Sabine SuppmannModeratorDear Colleagues
please note, that you have started this conversation in the public forum. Generally such questions would be better placed in the confidential forum. This network should not be a platform for advertising products neither the opposite.
Exchanging experience with commercial products shpuld be treated confidentially.Best
Sabine-
October 31, 2025 at 16:57 #5791
Luigi Angelo SciettiParticipantHi Sabine,
sorry, did’t realise it was the public forum.
I’ll open another discussion in the confidential one so that you can cancel this in case.
sorry again,
Best
Luigi
-
-
October 31, 2025 at 14:35 #5789

Sabine SuppmannModeratorDear Colleagues
please note, that you have started this conversation in the public forum. Generally such questions would be better placed in the confidential forum. This network should not be a platform for advertising products neither the opposite.
Exchanging experience with commercial products should be treated confidentially.Best
Sabine-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
Sabine Suppmann.
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.